| Re: [Proposal] [message #581 is a reply to message #579] |
Wed, 02 June 2004 16:59  |
Joachim.Rubröder
Messages: 33
Registered: September 2004
|
Member |
|
|
Hello,
to add connection trains into the timetable seems to be usefull.
An easy way would be to use the existing connection-Element with some
new enumerations for the connOperation-attribute like
"isWaitingFor"/"isExpectedBy" ... the other train mentioned in the
attribute "connection/trainID".
A more complicated way including waiting reasons like "staff", "engine",
"passengers" should be added in a later version, if there is a special
need for it.
Any proposals about this way of integration and/or the names of the
attributes?
Best regards,
Joachim Rubröder
Nils Poldrack schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> this is only a test for a run of a proposal. Please, do not take it
> seriously! But please, take your opportunity to discuss in the forum.
> Thank you very much
>
> Nils Poldrack
>
>
> My proposal:
> At a stop of a passenger train in a station there should be references
> to connection trains.
> Reasons: Information about connection trains can be given immediatly.
>
> (Ich hoffe, mein Englisch ist nicht all zu schlecht. Falls doch, hier
> noch mal die deutsche Übersetzung:
> Meines Erachtens sollen in das Timetable-Schema bei einem Halt eines
> Personenzuges im Bahnhof Referenzen auf mögliche Anschlusszüge eingebaut
> werden.
> Begründung: Auf diese Weise können unverzüglich Auskünfte über
> Anschlusszüge erteilt werden.)
>
> Nils Poldrack
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
