Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » [Proposal]
Re: [Proposal] [message #580 is a reply to message #579] Fri, 28 May 2004 10:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
thomas.kauer is currently offline  thomas.kauer
Messages: 15
Registered: January 2004
Junior Member
Hello,

this may be a usefull information. As far as I know there is no algorithm
that really works in all cases to get the connections needed.
One could also add an attribute to define the kind of connection:
- passenger
- staff
- engines
- ...
But for me this can be added in a later version of the schema if there is
a need for it.

Best regards



Nils Poldrack wrote:

> Hello,

> this is only a test for a run of a proposal. Please, do not take it
> seriously! But please, take your opportunity to discuss in the forum.
> Thank you very much

> Nils Poldrack


> My proposal:
> At a stop of a passenger train in a station there should be references
> to connection trains.
> Reasons: Information about connection trains can be given immediatly.

> (Ich hoffe, mein Englisch ist nicht all zu schlecht. Falls doch, hier
> noch mal die deutsche Übersetzung:
> Meines Erachtens sollen in das Timetable-Schema bei einem Halt eines
> Personenzuges im Bahnhof Referenzen auf mögliche Anschlusszüge eingebaut
> werden.
> Begründung: Auf diese Weise können unverzüglich Auskünfte über
> Anschlusszüge erteilt werden.)

> Nils Poldrack

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Timetable updates
Next Topic: timetable scheme 1.00 !!
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon May 06 11:28:46 CEST 2024