| Re: Infrastructure V0.94 Release 10 [message #29 is a reply to message #28] |
Fri, 26 September 2003 18:01  |
Matthias Hengartner
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2003
|
Member |
|
|
Hello,
thank you for the integration of my suggestions.
I have some (minor) remarks and questions concerning this new release of the
schema:
- The attribute "stationID" was removed from <crossSection>, but I think we
should leave it there (and rename it to "ocpId"). It shouldn't be replaced
by the attribute "elemId".
- I guess the attribute "switchName" (<switch>) is not needed anymore since
we have the attribute "name"?
- What's the meaning of the attribute "switchId"? It is not used in the
example, although there are some pairs of switches that belong together.
There should be a possibility to refer the counterpart of a switch. I
suggest that we simplify this task by referencing another switch via its
elemId (and of course via branchLineId and branchTrackId).
- I still guess that the attribute "isulatedSection" should be renamed
either into "insulatedSection" or "isolatedSection".
Best regards from Zurich-Hönggerberg
Matthias Hengartner
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
