| Re: Steckenunterbruch/line blocking [message #494 is a reply to message #490] |
Mon, 03 December 2012 20:31   |
Christian Rahmig
Messages: 151
Registered: January 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Dirk,
Am 03.12.2012 16:39, schrieb Dirk Bräuer:
> Dear Renato,
>
> thank you for your post, too, from my side.
>
> I think the line blockings are a matter of <timetable> rather than
> <infrastructure>. We should move there with the discussion.
I think, the blocking of a track or parts of lines fulfills both
aspects: it is situated somewhere between infrastructure and timetable.
In general, I want to define a certain part of the infrastructure to be
not available for any operational usage. Therefore, it is set to be
disabled. From the timetable perpective I want to tell the train an
operation schedule, which, of course, takes the closed infrastructure
into consideration.
In summary: we need both, a direct reference to the infrastructure,
which is disabled, and a reference to the timetable or the operating
period, during which the infrastructure is disabled.
Thank you for your offer anyway. Probably you can give a short sketch of
an example in order to clarify the timetable perspective towards closed
infrastructure?
Regards
--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
