Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » trainProtection and equipmentUsage
Re: trainProtectionElement, ETCS and balises [message #480 is a reply to message #473] Mon, 03 December 2012 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dirk Bräuer is currently offline  Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008
Senior Member
> Alternatively, I suggest to define two separate lists for listing train
> protection systems. The first one focuses on the train protection system
> device installed to the train...

+1

> Maybe we should rename it "tNationalSystemsTypeForVehicle"?

+1

> The second list "tNationalSystemsTypeOnRail" might be shorter because of
> discarding values such as 'IndusiXY' and summarizing them to 'PZB'.

+1 but please name it "tNationalSystemsTypeAtTrack" or "...Lineside" (the
first might be regarded exactly but the second one is usual in UK).

> "tNationalSystemsTypeOnRail" might be shorter because of discarding
> values such as 'IndusiXY' and summarizing them to 'PZB'.

For the sake of completeness: You leave the knowledge which
tNationalSystemsTypeAtTrack works with which tNationalSystemsTypeOnRail up
to the programmes. From my side, this is ok so far. For completeness, we
could include into to <interlocking> scheme or possibly in a separate
scheme the linkage and function of the train protection systems.

Best regards,
Dirk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: railML2: trackRef@sequence
Next Topic: [railML3] Mapping of tvdSection in infrastructure?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 03:52:56 CEST 2024