|
Forum: railML.infrastructure
|
|
Topic: [railML3] electrification is IS, RS and CO
|
| [railML3] electrification is IS, RS and CO [message #3247] |
Fri, 24 May 2024 13:06 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 437
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
the electrification model in railML 3.2 is rather heterogeneous: there are aspects in Common (CO), Infrastructure (IS) and Rollingstock (RS) schema. A detailed analysis can be found in the Gitlab issue #511 [1].
With railML 3.3 we want to harmonize the electrification model. A possible solution is also described in [1]. In detail:
* Move TractionMode from CO to RS.
* Remove ElectrificationSystem as base for TractionMode and add an electrificationSystemRef.
* Add an attribute to ElectrificationSystem specifying the type of electrical interface between the infrastructure and rolling stock to replace IS:electrificationSection@contactLineType and parts of RS:engine/powerMode/@mode and RS:trainEngine/tractionMode/@mode.
* Deprecate IS:electrificationSection@contactLineType.
* Replace "electricOverheadLine" and "electricThirdRail" with one common value in TractionMode/@mode
* Should we add more properties to RS to match the requirements specified in IS, or is there no demand for this?
* Clean up subelements of IS:electrificationSection (see #512 [2])
Any further feedback on this from the community is highly appreciated.
[1] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/511
[2] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/512
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
