Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Avalanche system and Derailment detection (Review the use of attributes for detectors)
Avalanche system and Derailment detection [message #3006] Wed, 01 June 2022 14:44 Go to next message
Georg Boasson is currently offline  Georg Boasson
Messages: 18
Registered: October 2020
Junior Member
Both detector@detects in Infrastructure and hasDetectorType@detectorType in Interlocking should be considered. detects="derailment" is missing and "avalanche" is defined for both attributes. How shall an avalanche area be defined? See the attached document for more details and examples.

[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 15:38]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Avalanche system and Derailment detection [message #3013 is a reply to message #3006] Fri, 10 June 2022 14:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Georg,

thank you for your feedback on railML 3.2 and the detector element in particular. Indeed, the first implementation of the detector in railML 3.2 has still some potential for improvement harmonizing the aspects in IS and IL schema. Therefore, I filed a Git issue [1] in our railML development system in order not to forget about this topic in railML 3.3.

Question to the railML community: which kind of additional requirements do you have regarding the modelling of incident and natural hazard detectors? Any comment is highly appreciated...

[1] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/508

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Re: Avalanche system and Derailment detection [message #3191 is a reply to message #3013] Wed, 07 February 2024 14:29 Go to previous message
Terje Nordal is currently offline  Terje Nordal
Messages: 7
Registered: December 2023
Junior Member
Dear Christian,

For a joint Norwegian (Bane NOR and Jernbanedirektoratet) suggestion on how to handle this topic, see the following forum post:
https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&goto=3190.

Best regards
Terje
Previous Topic: [railML3] Road traffic signals
Next Topic: Balise group values for IS:functionalType
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Mar 04 09:24:39 CET 2024