Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Single and double derailer
Single and double derailer [message #2906] Fri, 11 February 2022 11:14 Go to next message
Georg Boasson is currently offline  Georg Boasson
Messages: 18
Registered: October 2020
Junior Member
A derailer can be of different types. In Norway we differentiate between a derailer connected to one single rail and a derailer connected to both rails operating in parallel. The derailer is defined as one object in the infrastructure asset management. An attribute added in the <derailIS> might be a possible solution to differentiate between different types of derailers.
Suggestion: New attribute to the <derailerIS> in railML3:
• derailerType: Type of derailer equipment: possible values are single and double

Re: Single and double derailer [message #2907 is a reply to message #2906] Fri, 11 February 2022 13:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Georg Boasson is currently offline  Georg Boasson
Messages: 18
Registered: October 2020
Junior Member
It seems that our double derailer always is located inside a switch and therefore connected to 2 different tracks, but with the same control (see attached picture). My question will therefore be how to model this double derailer in railML3. Two <switchIS> elements with refrence to 1 <switckIL> element?
Re: Single and double derailer [message #2943 is a reply to message #2907] Wed, 09 March 2022 15:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Martin Zien is currently offline  Martin Zien
Messages: 14
Registered: December 2021
Junior Member
According to our discussion in last work groupmeeting ETCS:
- Introduce an attribute "type" with options "singleDerailer" & "doubleDerailer"
- A doubleDerailer would then have to be modeled with two (spot)location-entries - each related to the affected netElement
Re: Single and double derailer [message #2947 is a reply to message #2943] Thu, 10 March 2022 09:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Georg Boasson is currently offline  Georg Boasson
Messages: 18
Registered: October 2020
Junior Member
A solution in UML has been proposed by Jörg von Lingen. See attached file.
Re: Single and double derailer [message #2951 is a reply to message #2947] Fri, 11 March 2022 02:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 87
Registered: March 2016
Member
Dear all,

with the new type attribute in <derailerIS> I would prefer the solution with one
object <derailerIS> and one object <derailerIL>.

<!—infrastructure layer -->
<infrastructure>
....
<derailerIS id="dris01" type="doubleDerailer">
<spotLocation .../>
<spotLocation .../>
</derailerIS>
....
</infrastructure>

<!—Interlocking layer - ->
<interlocking>
....
<derailerIL id="dril01">
<refersTo ref=dris01"/>
<lockedTrack ref="trk231"/>
<lockedTrack ref="trk232"/>
</derailerIL>
....
</interlocking>


Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
Re: Single and double derailer [message #2952 is a reply to message #2951] Fri, 11 March 2022 08:57 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 439
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

I filed a Git issue for this topic [1].

[1] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/495

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: [railML3] How to assign a mileage change to a netElement
Next Topic: railML 3.2: Additional information for travel paths in a macroscopic netElement
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 16 04:56:39 CEST 2024