Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » swicthType "interlacedSwitch" in IL
swicthType "interlacedSwitch" in IL [message #2101] Wed, 16 January 2019 12:21 Go to next message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 89
Registered: March 2016
Member
Dear all,

in the IL schema we have currently the possibility to mark a switch as type "interlacedSwitch" with relation to another
switch because they both might have a dependency for interlocking operation. This particular type is currently not
forseen in IS at all. Do we need this type?

attached a photo of such interlaced switches ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Plektita_trakforko_14.jp eg)
--
Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
Re: swicthType "interlacedSwitch" in IL [message #2121 is a reply to message #2101] Mon, 28 January 2019 11:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 447
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Jörg,
dear all,

Am 16.01.2019 um 12:21 schrieb Joerg von Lingen:
> [...]
> in the IL schema we have currently the possibility to mark a switch as type "interlacedSwitch" with relation to another
> switch because they both might have a dependency for interlocking operation. This particular type is currently not
> forseen in IS at all. Do we need this type?
> [...]

it seems that there is no need for the "interlaced switch" at the
moment. Thus, I recommend to skip this topic for railML 3.1.

Best regards
Christian

--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Re: swicthType "interlacedSwitch" in IL [message #2124 is a reply to message #2121] Tue, 29 January 2019 05:52 Go to previous message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 89
Registered: March 2016
Member
switchType in IL plus the possible value "interlacedSwitch" is deleted

Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
Christian Rahmig wrote on 28.01.2019 11:10:
> Dear Jörg,
> dear all,
>
> Am 16.01.2019 um 12:21 schrieb Joerg von Lingen:
>> [...]
>> in the IL schema we have currently the possibility to mark a switch as type "interlacedSwitch" with relation to another
>> switch because they both might have a dependency for interlocking operation. This particular type is currently not
>> forseen in IS at all. Do we need this type?
>> [...]
>
> it seems that there is no need for the "interlaced switch" at the
> moment. Thus, I recommend to skip this topic for railML 3.1.
>
> Best regards
> Christian
>
Previous Topic: Double switch crossing: 'crossingRef' attribute for the fictive switches
Next Topic: [railml3.1] Make @applicationDirection optional
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jul 20 08:34:52 CEST 2024