| [railML3] Concept Location: RTM location association to railML entity [message #1644] |
Fri, 15 September 2017 11:20  |
Fabrizio Cosso
Messages: 12
Registered: September 2017
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
Since I'm new to RailML community I introduce myself: I'm Fabrizio Cosso from Ansaldo STS and I'm following standardization activities. I'm trying to familiarize with the railMLv3 model.
In the Concept Location class diagram there are associations from RTM classes to railML classes (i.e. RTM_SpotLocation associated to SpotLocationOnTrack).
Generally speaking is it correct to create an association originating from RTM model towards railML classes? I would expect link in the opposite direction.
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Fabrizio Cosso
|
|
|
|
| Re: [railML3] Concept Location: RTM location association to railML entity [message #1668 is a reply to message #1644] |
Mon, 20 November 2017 16:23  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 463
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Fabrizio,
dear all,
the issue has been solved with railML 3.1 beta. There is no further
association from a RTM based class to a pure railML class.
Best regards
Christian
Am 15.09.2017 um 11:20 schrieb Fabrizio Cosso:
> Dear all,
> Since I'm new to RailML community I introduce myself: I'm
> Fabrizio Cosso from Ansaldo STS and I'm following
> standardization activities. I'm trying to familiarize with
> the railMLv3 model.
> In the Concept Location class diagram there are associations
> from RTM classes to railML classes (i.e. RTM_SpotLocation
> associated to SpotLocationOnTrack).
> Generally speaking is it correct to create an association
> originating from RTM model towards railML classes? I would
> expect link in the opposite direction.
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabrizio Cosso
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [railML3] Concept Location: RTM location association to railML entity [message #1888 is a reply to message #1869] |
Mon, 06 August 2018 11:55 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 463
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Felix,
Am 05.07.2018 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Prüter:
> Dear all,
> I might be wrong but to me it (associations from rtm to
> railml classes) seems to be still there, isn't it?
>
> Please have a look on a screenshot of the aforementioned
> diagram in the current railML v3.1 beta model:
> https://www.signon-group.de/signoncloud/index.php/s/PvAuBc9E Pn4VJTj
>
> Kind regards
The class Entity is not a RTM class, but derived from
RTM_LocatedNetEntity. Therefore, the extension (references to
GmlLocations etc.) is made from a railML class and not from a RTM class.
From content point of view you are right: While RTM does not have
references to specific location extensions like GML or track, railML
model has. However, considering the introduction of length information
in RTM NetElement as described in forum entry [1], a reference to
"trackPosition" and "trackSection" is no longer needed and can be
removed from the model. Further, in forum entry [2] I suggested to
introduce NetworkLocation as new RTM EntityLocation sub-class.
[1] https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=579& start=0&
[2] https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=598& start=0&
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
