Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » Protocol developer meeting 22nd January 2016 at PSI
Protocol developer meeting 22nd January 2016 at PSI [message #1352] Tue, 08 March 2016 15:54
Christian Rößiger is currently offline  Christian Rößiger
Messages: 16
Registered: March 2015
Junior Member
Dear all,

I put down some topics and conclusions we discussed during the last
developer meeting. This protocol may be used as a base for the next
meeting. Feel free to comment, if I got something wrong or missed
important topics.

Protocol railML meeting 22nd january 2016

1) Presentation of new railML web site by Vasco Kolmorgen

- Description of partner companies
(http://www.railml.org/en/introduction/partners.html) and software tools
(http://www.railml.org/en/introduction/software.html) need to be updated
- registration on the web site is encouraged, because some parts (e.g.
calendar) are only accessable for registered users

2) review of changes in railML version 2.3

2a) TAF/TAP-services (https://trac.railml.org/ticket/250)
For now implemented as code attribute. ERA provides a list which
contains a description for each service code. This list is only
available as a *.pdf document, therefore it cannot be integrated in the
railML scheme. The wiki description page for this new element shall contain:
- the link to the *.pdf document of the ERA
- some examples for service codes and their description from this list

2b) Connections to trains outside the railML file
The diskussion showed, that the current implementation misses an
attribute for the key of the referenced train (train number, unique
train id, etc.).
Decision for railML 2.3: the target train of a connection should be
referenced by one of the following elements in descending priority:
- trainRef
- TAF/TAP train Id
- trainNumber + operator
- free text field
The connection structure will be extended in that direction

For a next major release this model should be improved / extended,
discussed ideas are:
- allow referencing of train lines in terms of "connection to RE4 in
direction XX"
- referencing "dummy" trains that contain only its "key" (no itinerary
or times) by trainRef, to avoid having several train identification
structures scattered all over the railML scheme. This is not possible
with the current scheme, because parts of the train id
(organizationalUnitBinding operator) are referenced only by the
trainPart but not by the train

- Open issue: What's the meaning of the attributes "minConnTime" /
"maxConnTime" in the connection element? Wiki description should be
added, otherwise the attributes should be marked as deprecated

2c) Operating period for trainPartSequence (suggestion by iRFP)
- needed for clearer definition of the trainParts of commercial trains,
if operating periods of the trainParts change within the commercial train
- reason and possible solution were explained with a presentation
- resolution: should be implemented using an any-attribute, topic will
be discussed again when refactoring relation between trains and
trainParts for railML3

3) Meaning and handling of the "deprecated" flag. Shall new software
versions get a certification if they produce railML with deprecated

General point of view: Writing of deprecated elements should not be
introduced newly, but downward compatibility within minor version steps
shall persist. It should be possible to implement a new railML version
partially and step by step.

- Exporting programs should get a certification for minor railML version
steps, although they still write deprecated elements
- Importing programs should get a certification only if they support the
"replacement modeling" of a deprecated element / attribute.

4) Wiki documentation
- Changes of railML2.3 have to be documented in the wiki by the developers
- Differences between railML versions should be mentioned on the general
changes site (http://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=CO:changes)

5) Further development of railML 3
- suggestion by Leopold Kühschelm to use inheritance of abstract railML
elements instead of any elements / attributes. This would result in a
stricter XML scheme for custom extensions

- Discussion about common understanding of the most important railML
terms: Several railML elements are used and understood in different
senses by the railML developers, which makes it almost impossible to
discuss the further development direction. A common glossary of some of
the most fundamental terms and elements should be created before
starting work on a next major release. This includes the following
elements (not complete):
* unique train id
* operational and commercial trains, trainPart
* trainGroup
* operatingPeriod, timetablePeriod
* connections between trains
* itineraries (ocpsTT)

6) Miscellaneous

Next developer meeting will take place 2nd June 2016, again at PSI
Transcom GmbH, Berlin

Kind regards
Christian Rößiger

iRFP e. K. · Institut für Regional- und Fernverkehrsplanung
Hochschulstr. 45, 01069 Dresden
Tel. +49 351 4706819 · Fax. +49 351 4768190 · www.irfp.de
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dresden, HRA 9347
Previous Topic: Additional commercial attributes from TAP TSI for timetables
Next Topic: Infrastructure train number
Goto Forum:

Current Time: Sun Jan 21 23:20:35 CET 2018