Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] <border> of type infrastructureManager (misses reference to the infrastructure manager)
[railML3] <border> of type infrastructureManager [message #3149] Thu, 26 October 2023 10:10 Go to next message
Larissa Zhuchyi is currently offline  Larissa Zhuchyi
Messages: 38
Registered: November 2022
Member
Dear all

Currently railML ontology is under development [1] aiming at the harmonization (transformation) of railML2 and railML3. This forum post is related to <border> of type infrastructureManager of railML3.

Intuitively <ownerChange> of railML2 should be mapped to <border> of railML3. The problem is that <ownerChange> of railML2 has the additional attribute @infrastructureManagerRef to reference presumably following owner of the railway tracks.

In railML3 <border> of type infrastructureManager misses this reference. Thus when transforming railML2 to railML3 information on @infrastructureManagerRef is lost.

Even when not speaking about railML2 to railML3 mapping, railML3 data on <border> of type infrastructureManager without references seems incomplete.

railML.org would be grateful if you could communicate your thoughts on the following points:
(1) should railML 3.3 be extended by @infrastructureManagerRef for <border> element?
(2) do you see any other ways (implicit) to refer to infrastructure manager from <border> of type infrastructureManager in railML3?

[1] https://www.railml.org/en/public-relations/news/reader/railm l-ontology-subgroup-started.html

Sincerely,


Larissa Zhuchyi – Ontology Researcher
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Re: [railML3] <border> of type infrastructureManager [message #3204 is a reply to message #3149] Mon, 11 March 2024 19:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Michael Gruschwitz is currently offline  Michael Gruschwitz
Messages: 12
Registered: May 2020
Junior Member
Dear colleagues!

Am 26.10.2023 um 10:10 schrieb Larysa Zhuchyi:
> railML.org would be grateful if you could communicate your
> thoughts on the following points:
> (1) should railML 3.3 be extended by
> @infrastructureManagerRef for <border> element?
> (2) do you see any other ways (implicit) to refer to
> infrastructure manager from <border> of type
> infrastructureManager in railML3?

Regarding question 1: Yes, please.
Regarding question 1: No, and we would appreciate it if we could
explicitly express the data to be exchanged.

I would leave the exact modelling to the experts.
We would be happy if such a modelling would be done also in a more
general way for other borders like country borders (e.g. Germany,
Austria, Switzerland, Spain, ...), state borders (e.g. in Germany
"Bundesland" or in Switzerland "Kanton") as well.

Best regards,
--
Michael Gruschwitz
Bahnkonzept Dresden/Germany
Re: [railML3] <border> of type infrastructureManager [message #3212 is a reply to message #3204] Wed, 13 March 2024 14:17 Go to previous message
Larissa Zhuchyi is currently offline  Larissa Zhuchyi
Messages: 38
Registered: November 2022
Member
Dear all

There is now a ticket/issue for this problem in the GitLab of railML3 [1]. Please let us know if it doesn't meet your expectations.

[1] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/531

Sincerely,


Larissa Zhuchyi – Ontology Researcher
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: Avalanche system and Derailment detection
Next Topic: [railML3] Positioning approach
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 25 08:59:37 CEST 2024