Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Requirements for RTCI-a (Infrastructure) UC
Requirements for RTCI-a (Infrastructure) UC [message #3131] Thu, 21 September 2023 16:57 Go to next message
Torben Brand is currently offline  Torben Brand
Messages: 162
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
With reference to the post to create a run time calculation input parameter use case in the TT forum ( https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=906& start=0&)

We are currently working on the RTCI-a UC (sub-UC for infrastructure) in the SCTP working group. But I would also like to include the rest of the community through this post.

I suggest to add the following infrastructure elements to the RTCI-a UC:
- metadata
- operational point (OP)
- Reference point OP
- Stop marker
- topology
- Mileage change
- speed
- Deflecting speed
- gradient
- Tunnel (resistance)
- (main)signal & route
- Clearance (for main signal)
- Operational rules (limiting)
- electrficationChange
- trainProtectionSystemChange
- restrictions

Se attached image for illustration, and attached Excel sheet for an overview table with simple mapping towards railML3.2 and comments on the elements.

I have mapped the elements towards railML3.2 in the table bellow and also to requirements in the attribute table for railML3.2 attached and in the cloud: https://cloud.railml.org/s/Xe3WXrpciBtjstS (You find it in the folder: "Working group IS/UseCases/uc_SCTP/03_elementSpecification")

The Excel contains two sheets. One "RTCI-a high level" for just the main elements (26 rows) and one sheet "railML_3.2_uc-SCTP+RTCI-a" for all the attributes (with 10515 rows!).

I have also made a smallest possible model for RTC in NorRailView:
https://railoscope.com/tickets/bRbcASDgBifKJ9rM?modelId=64e5 d0e6bd09d86eb8d810cb
You can access it with this open link and download it in certified railML2.4nor. As version 3.2 is pending certification, it is not available for open download, but I have attached the file here for illustration purpose only.

[Updated on: Fri, 29 September 2023 13:19]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Requirements for RTCI-a (Infrastructure) UC [message #3151 is a reply to message #3131] Fri, 27 October 2023 15:08 Go to previous message
Francesca Iannaccone is currently offline  Francesca Iannaccone
Messages: 3
Registered: October 2023
Junior Member
Dear Torben,

thank you for your post. At the moment we (NEAT) only support some of these elements so we are not able to fully cover this use case. We probably will in some months. However, the UC you presented is very interesting and we agree with your proposal.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: How to mark the end of a speed restriction?
Next Topic: Link a "doubleSwitchCrossing" to two switchesIL
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Oct 14 13:16:19 CEST 2024