Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Restrictions (How to model restrictions as business objects?)
[railML3] Restrictions [message #3062] Wed, 15 March 2023 14:02 Go to next message
David Lichti is currently offline  David Lichti
Messages: 13
Registered: December 2020
Junior Member
Hi community,
We (HaCon) need to export restrictions as business objects in railML 3. But as far as I can see, railML 3.2 currently only offers restriction areas. Is there any way to group these restriction areas into a higher level object with it's own properties?

In the past, we had a custom extension on top of railML 2 to represent these business objects. And we are now thinking about a similar extension of railML 3 to add the necessary elements and attributes. Are there any other developments into that direction that we should consider for this extension?

Best regards

David Lichti
Re: [railML3] Restrictions [message #3076 is a reply to message #3062] Mon, 24 April 2023 22:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear David,

the current implementation of the <restrictionArea> is rather basic, which means that it is not possible to group restriction areas forming "parent" restriction areas. Apart from the statement that railML 3.2 does not provide "business objects" build on top of restriction areas, I want to ask the rest of the community about their experiences with restriction areas and their implementation. If there is interest from several sides, we may not only think about a user-specific extension, but we may also consider a schema enhancement...

As usual, any comments are highly appreciated.

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Re: [railML3] Restrictions [message #3102 is a reply to message #3076] Mon, 03 July 2023 15:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Milan Wölke is currently offline  Milan Wölke
Messages: 139
Registered: April 2007
Senior Member
Hi all,

for those who were not able to attend the conference, I wanted to make the slides of David available. He held a short presentation on the general idea of the use case proposed here. Please let us know if you are interested in participating in a user group.

Best regards, Milan


Milan Wölke – Timetable scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Re: [railML3] Restrictions [message #3123 is a reply to message #3102] Mon, 04 September 2023 10:36 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

please let me remind you to provide us your feedback if you are interested in the topic of "restriction areas" and if you wanted to contribute by joining a related user group?

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: Level crossing with extended information
Next Topic: [railML3] Proposal of a semantic constraint for mileageChange
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 18 14:38:31 CEST 2024