Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » interlocking -> signalling
interlocking -> signalling [message #2488] Wed, 08 July 2020 14:26 Go to next message
Stefan Hubrig is currently offline  Stefan Hubrig
Messages: 5
Registered: October 2018
Junior Member
Dear railML Users,

since traditional borders disappear, I propose to rename the schema "interlocking" to "signalling" or something similiar in railML 3.2

Best regards,
Stefan Hubrig

Report message to a moderator

Re: interlocking -> signalling [message #2489 is a reply to message #2488] Wed, 08 July 2020 16:28 Go to previous message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 106
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

I would support this suggestion as the content is more than just "interlocking".
Thus it will better describe the parts covered. This would allow as consequence
to rename the "signalBox" to "interlocking".

But it shall be clear to everyone, that backward compatibility to v3.1 is voided.

Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC
Next Topic: Re: [railML3]: keyLocksIL and ownsLogicalDevice
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 15 19:29:21 CET 2025