Home » railML newsgroups » railml.common » Advanced Example
Advanced Example [message #2273] Tue, 12 November 2019 06:09 Go to next message
Jörg von Lingen is currently offline  Jörg von Lingen
Messages: 87
Registered: March 2016
Member
Dear all,

as briefly explained last week in Brussels the signalling part as presented might look too conventional on first sight.
However, the intention was to have a wider variety and the branch line was not really appealing for ETCS. I would expect
some extension onto the right, which is more suitable for ETCS purpose. This might then also allow for transition areas
and other specialtities. Of course, we won't be able to cover all possibilities of railway world.

Christian and myself would appreciate your suggestions for this advanced example.
--
Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking Coordinator
Re: Advanced Example [message #2287 is a reply to message #2273] Fri, 06 December 2019 20:15 Go to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 439
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

all your ideas for the content of the Advanced Example are being collected in Trac ticket #351 [1]

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/351

Best regards
Christian


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Previous Topic: railml 3.1 validation
Next Topic: Ambiguity of "line"
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 17 01:54:02 CEST 2024