[railML2] extend <formation> with the attribute @load [message #2562] |
Tue, 27 October 2020 21:41  |
Torben Brand
Messages: 180 Registered: March 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear railML-community,
In the Norwegian railway sector we would like to use predefined formations for usage in the timetable. For this purpose we would also like to use formations with real referenced vehicle, but with virtual wagons and payload. This is possible today in railML2.4, but is cumbersome as you can only define the complete formations weight with payload with usage of formation@bruttoWeight. We would like to be able to define only the towed weight of the wagons and payload, excluding the locomotive. This in the same manner as possible in formationTT@load.
If this attribute is of interest for more users, we would welcome a discussion for a possible integration of a new attribute formation@load in railML2.5. Any feedback is highly appreciated.
If both formation@load and formationTT@load are defined, formationTT@load takes precedence.
PS. We also recommend making the definitions of weight, load and timetableLoad under formationTT in the wiki more precise. What is meant with "real"? We also recommend making the definitions of bruttoWeight, nettoWeight and tareWeight under
formation in the wiki more precise. What is meant with "of that formation"?
I have attached an illustration to try to illustrate the definitions and the suggested new attribute.
Kind regards
Torben Brand
Jernbanedirektoratet
|
|
|
Re: [railML2] extend <formation> with the attribute @load [message #2570 is a reply to message #2562] |
Mon, 02 November 2020 05:55   |
Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 150 Registered: May 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Torben,
that's a good idea. The weight attributes for a formation were simply "copied" from vehicle. However, the needs for
weight values of a formation are different.
[railML3]: I will consider this for the new development.
--
Regards,
Jörg von Lingen - Rollingstock Coordinator
Torben Brand wrote on 27.10.2020 21:41
Dear railML-community,
In the Norwegian railway sector we would like to use predefined formations for usage in the timetable. For this purpose we would also like to use formations with real referenced vehicle, but with virtual wagons and payload. This is possible today in railML2.4, but is cumbersome as you can only define the complete formations weight with payload with usage of formation@bruttoWeight. We would like to be able to define only the towed weight of the wagons and payload, excluding the locomotive. This in the same manner as possible in formationTT@load.
If this attribute is of interest for more users, we would welcome a discussion for a possible integration of a new attribute formation@load in railML2.5. Any feedback is highly appreciated.
If both formation@load and formationTT@load are defined, formationTT@load takes precedence.
PS. We also recommend making the definitions of weight, load and timetableLoad under formationTT in the wiki more precise. What is meant with "real"? We also recommend making the definitions of bruttoWeight, nettoWeight and tareWeight under
formation in the wiki more precise. What is meant with "of that formation"?
I have attached an illustration to try to illustrate the definitions and the suggested new attribute.
Kind regards
Torben Brand
Jernbanedirektoratet
Attachment: formationWeight.pdf
[Updated on: Thu, 05 November 2020 14:08] by Moderator Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|