| Re: railML 2.3 infrastructure extension proposal - locks [message #1521 is a reply to message #1512] |
Fri, 03 March 2017 15:48   |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Torben,
thank you very much for your feedback and answers. So, I created a Trac
ticket for this issue, which can be found in [1]. If you think, that
there are still some points missing, please let us know.
Am 24.02.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Torben Brand:
> My reply:
> The use case is for signal drawings. Locks are physical
> logical elements that can lock switches and derailers in
> ceratin positions. These elements need to be referenced. The
> derailers are obviously train protection elements. Switches
> can be if they act a protective/deflective switches. But
> it's not the lock that forms the train protection element.
> Thus I suggest creating them as separate elements. Correction there are
> 6 types of locks in Norway. The 6
> Norwegian lock types are: type: A,B,C,D, E and S.
Two short questions:
* Are there always 2 elements linked together via a lock or do you know
examples with more elements?
* Are the Norwegian lock types very country-specific or are they known
in other countries, too?
[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/305
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
