| Re: [railML3|alpha] Suggestion for an enhanced topology model [message #1497 is a reply to message #1445] |
Mon, 13 February 2017 15:32   |
Matthieu Perin
Messages: 10
Registered: February 2017
Location: Lille, France
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi,
If I may give my opinion about the philosophy behind a Topological "pure" part for the RTM meta model is good, but I see two major issues with the objects then :
- If we need only a Topological view, why there have to be difference between linear and non-linear elements ?. Such differences does not exist in the topological level, as these elements are all nodes and can be navigate whatsoever.
- If we keep separated Linear and Non Linear element for clarity purpose (which is good in my opinion) then the two object MUST have somme differences : e.g. a linear element should have a "length" attribute that is not existing for the non-linear one.
I hope It can help thinking about the meta model !
--
Matthieu Perin
IFSTTAR
matthieuperin(at)ifsttarfr
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
