Home » RailTopoModel newsgroup » RailTopoModel » Wording remarks to IRS30100 (Collective thread to all verbalisation or wordings in the IRS30100 (Version April 19th, 2016))
IRS 30100 wording remarks [message #1374 is a reply to message #1373] Thu, 23 June 2016 14:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Felix Prüter is currently offline  Felix Prüter
Messages: 28
Registered: June 2016
Location: Berlin
Junior Member
Hello,
here are some more wording remarks to the IRS 30100:

p.30, last note:
the part after the last comma seems superfluously

ch 6.2.11, z2nd par:
the description about the relation between PositioningNetElement und AssociatedPositioningElement is wrong.
APS is contained by PNE!

ch 6.3.6:
defines the generic concept of a coordinate in a POSITIONING (not referencing) system

ch 6.3.7, 2nd sentence:
Should be two sentences
1. value range of attribute intrinsicCoord 0..1
2. Arbitrary amount of associated PositioningSystemCoordinate instances

ch 6.4.5:
in reference to one OR MORE PositioningNetElement
according to Figure 72 only ONE!

ch 6.4.5:
Attribute applicationDirection: direction of the LINEARLOCATION?
better: LinearElement?

ch 6.4.9:
between a LinearLocation and PositioningSystemCoordinate INSTANCES (is missing)

Kind regards
Felix
SIGNON Deutschland GmbH

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Attribute applicationDirection of LinearLocation
Next Topic: Redundant attribute description table
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu May 02 15:40:51 CEST 2024