Forum: railML.infrastructure » train protection systems

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » train protection systems

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

train protection systems [message #1240]

Wed, 07 January 2015 08:45

Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011

Senior Member

Hi all,

w.r.t. the harmonisation of and semantic rules for the train protection systems
I found one rule which cannot be formally proofed:
The values of "trainProtectionMedium" and "trainProtectionMonitoring" shall be
consistent with "type" in <nationalSystem>.

As this seems to be a fixed 1:1 relation I would propose to extend the
accompanied file TrainProtectionSystems.xml by this information to allow a
formal check.

--
Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen

Rollingstock Coordinator

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		train protection systems By: Joerg von Lingen on Wed, 07 January 2015 08:45
		Re: train protection systems By: Christian Rahmig on Mon, 09 February 2015 10:24
		Re: train protection systems By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 08 May 2015 19:22

Previous Topic:	Introduction of TAF-TSI PrimaryLocationCode as reference
Next Topic:	Borders of states, tarifs etc.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 07:34:56 CEST 2024