Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » Defining data group "leadingVehicle"
Re: Defining data group "leadingVehicle" [message #1201 is a reply to message #1200] Fri, 22 October 2010 11:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Carsten Weber is currently offline  Carsten Weber
Messages: 27
Registered: November 2011
Junior Member
Dear RailML-Users,

I would prefer the first proposal.
The second proposal assumes a drivers cab as a requirement for a leading
vehicle.
There are cases, where leading vehicles do not have a drivers cab.
You can see an example at
http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/christoph.schmitz2/signale/s ignale_rwe.html
(german only).
But there are also other examples like fully automated underground trains.

In both cases I would like to rename "otherEquipment" to "deadManControl" or
adding "deadManControl" and keeping "otherEquipment" free for other cases
like "EBuLa".

Best regards.

Carsten Weber

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Data for maintenance intervals - info needed
Next Topic: Wording of weight attributes
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat May 04 06:52:33 CEST 2024