Forum: railml.timetable » <trackRef>.dir

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » <trackRef>.dir

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: <trackRef>.dir [message #795 is a reply to message #786]

Wed, 30 May 2012 14:57

Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008

Senior Member

Dear Susanne,

Am 29.05.2012, 13:45 Uhr, schrieb Susanne Wunsch <coord(at)commonrailmlorg>:

> Currently the absence of the attribute has the same semantics as the
> attribute "dir" with value "unknown". I don't know if these two
> possibilities of defining the same meaning introduce any troubles in
> programming.

From my experience: No problem, full redundancy. From my side we should
avoid 'unknown' and leave the possibility to skip the attribute.

> We keep in mind that there will be a renaming of the enumeration values
> in next major release (raising, falling).

Can we exchange "keep in mind" with "create a track ticket"? ;-)

Or expand the track ticket you already created for the same renamings in
IS ?

Thank you,
Dirk.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		<trackRef>.dir By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 22 May 2012 21:45
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 14:07
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 13:45
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Dirk Bräuer on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:57
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Wed, 30 May 2012 16:17

Previous Topic:	RFE for stop description
Next Topic:	missing bitMask at <trainPart><operatingPeriodRef>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu May 16 08:15:04 CEST 2024