Forum: railml.timetable » <trackRef>.dir

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » <trackRef>.dir

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

<trackRef>.dir [message #783]

Tue, 22 May 2012 21:45

Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008

Senior Member

Dear Joachim,

I have one small issue for RailML 2.2:

We should clearify and ease the attribute
<trainPart>.<ocpTT>.<sectionTT>.<trackRef>.dir.

So far, it has the enumeration values up, down, unknown, none, and both.
The only two which make sense are up & down but both should be renamed to
'falling' and 'raising' as in infrastructure (see also news message from
26.03.2012 and Trac ticket #145).

The others are not applicable and should be deleted. (Instead of using
'unknown' one should skip the optional attribute.)

Thank you and best regards,
Dirk.

---
Das Attribut <trainPart>.<ocpTT>.<sectionTT>.<trackRef>.dir ist mit den
Ausprägungen up, down, unknown, none und both definiert. Die einzig
sinnvollen sind up und down, wobei diese in raising und falling
umdefiniert werden sollten. Die übrigen sind nicht zutreffend (statt
unknown kann das optionale Attribut weggelassen werden) und sollten daher
entfallen.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		<trackRef>.dir By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 22 May 2012 21:45
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 14:07
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 13:45
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Dirk Bräuer on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:57
		Re: <trackRef>.dir By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Wed, 30 May 2012 16:17

Previous Topic:	RFE for stop description
Next Topic:	missing bitMask at <trainPart><operatingPeriodRef>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Apr 30 00:49:33 CEST 2024