Forum: railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #885 is a reply to message #879]

Mon, 12 November 2012 23:04

Susanne Wunsch railML is currently offline

Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0
Registered: January 2020

Dear Dirk,

Dirk Bräuer <dirkbraeuer(at)irfpde> writes:

>> Do you mean "Lok umsetzen" with "formation reverse"?
>
> Of course not. Running ‘round with the engine does not reverse the
> formation, it changes the formation.
>
> ---
> Concerning the meaning of <ocpTT>.trainReverse:
> ---

[...]

Clarified. Thank you.

> ---
> Concerning the meaning of <formationTT>.orientationReversed:
> ---

[...]

Clarified. Thank you.

> ---
>> I'm sorry, I don't see the difference between a train and a
>> formation reverse.

[...]

Thanks for this clarification, too.

> (This refers to the current situation in RailML. It changes if we
> declare <ocpTT>.trainReverse obsolete and declare
> <formationTT>.orientationReversed to be used by definition as
> recommended in the previous post.)

I'm sorry this idea is based on my misunderstanding of the current
situation. So what would be the pros and cons of changing the current
situation?

PROs:
* Unambiguous connection definitions
* "Redundancy reduction": only one place in the schema where to define
reversing of train parts and/or whole trains

CONs:
* Changing current implementations with no strong need

> Hope I was able to clarify the difference between trainReverse and
> orientationReversed.

I think you got it!

Thanks a lot.

Kind regards...
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 15 November 2011 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 17:51
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 22:44
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 10:21
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:16
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Fri, 01 June 2012 10:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 27 September 2012 16:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 10:47
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 16:36
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:05
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:54
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 11:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:00
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:17
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 22:46
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:11
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:29
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 19:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 23:04
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 13 November 2012 12:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 00:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 15 November 2012 17:37
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Daniel Prusseit on Fri, 23 November 2012 16:08
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Mon, 26 November 2012 13:09
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 27 November 2012 16:48
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 18:52
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:55
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 17:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 18:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:26
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Sat, 08 December 2012 22:03

Previous Topic:	stop probability
Next Topic:	wiki: missing attribute description for additionalTrainNumber at <train>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 06 05:17:28 CEST 2024