Forum: railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #875 is a reply to message #873]

Fri, 09 November 2012 16:29

Susanne Wunsch railML is currently offline

Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0
Registered: January 2020

Dirk Bräuer <dirkbraeuer(at)irfpde> writes:
>> It changes its running direction in Eschwege, that means "it reverses".
>
> please do not mix the "trainReverse" attribute with the
> "orientationReversed" attribute.
>
> - "trainReverse" is an attribute of <ocpTT>,
> - "orientationReversed" is an attribute of <formationTT>.

I'm sorry, you're right. I missed the attribute 'trainReverse' in the
'ocpTT' element.

> If only the train reverses but not the formation, there is currently
> no need to separate two <trainParts>.

I'm sorry, I don't see the difference between a train and a formation
reverse.

Do you mean "Lok umsetzen" with "formation reverse"?

The wiki says about the 'trainReverse' in 'ocpTT' (since 2011-05-10):

trainReverse : is true if train changes direction at this station
(xs:boolean, optional). After this station the
rollingstock which is referenced in formationTT changes
order. This attribute could also been set at the first
station, indicating that the formation starts in the
reversed order.

It is currently not forseen to split the train part because of the
reversing - yes.

> With your suggestion to _enforce_ two train parts if a train reverses
> (which I would welcome as mentioned in the previous post), the
> situation changes:
>
> We could now declare "trainReverse" being obsolete since we could
> always use "orientationReversed" (also for single MUs by definition)
> because we always will have to have a new <trainPart>.

+1

Kind regards...
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 15 November 2011 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 17:51
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 22:44
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 10:21
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:16
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Fri, 01 June 2012 10:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 27 September 2012 16:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 10:47
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 16:36
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:05
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:54
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 11:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:00
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:17
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 22:46
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:11
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:29
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 19:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 23:04
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 13 November 2012 12:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 00:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 15 November 2012 17:37
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Daniel Prusseit on Fri, 23 November 2012 16:08
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Mon, 26 November 2012 13:09
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 27 November 2012 16:48
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 18:52
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:55
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 17:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 18:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:26
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Sat, 08 December 2012 22:03

Previous Topic:	stop probability
Next Topic:	wiki: missing attribute description for additionalTrainNumber at <train>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 06 08:25:01 CEST 2024