Forum: railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #865 is a reply to message #859]

Fri, 09 November 2012 11:43

Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 311
Registered: August 2008

Senior Member

Dear all,

> But this train reverses at Eschwege. That means there should be at least
> two train parts in order to define the reversed vehicle order.

Dear Susanne: Please don't lose sight of the forest for the trees... ;-)

- If the train consists of one MU only (most of the trains do so) - what
do you want to reverse there? (Please note that there is no possibility to
describe the orientation of a single vehicle in a <formation>.)
- It is not necessary to specify a formation at all (<formationTT> is
optional). So, for a simple timetable description - may be a passenger
information like HAFAS - there is no need to use create two train parts.
- I can also send you an exempli gratia where a train passes a station
twice without reversing...

But another question we should ask ourselves is: If we specify a
connection with trainPartRef and ocpRef - may it be that the right
interpretation follows from the contents?

Train #24090 stops at Niederhone 14.28 (direction to Eschwege) and again
14.38 (direction to Göttingen). A (hypothetical) bus could arrive at
Niederhone on 14.25 an referring a connection to #24090.
- Do the min/maxConTime attributes help us to specify the right stop?
- Should we (alternatively) refer to <ocpTT>.sequence (the counter)
instead of <ocp>?
- Should we (alternatively) provide optional "directionToOcpRef" and
"directionFromOcpRef" attributes to clarify the situation?

With best regards,
Dirk.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 15 November 2011 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 17:51
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 29 May 2012 22:44
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 10:21
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:16
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Wed, 30 May 2012 14:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Andreas Tanner on Fri, 01 June 2012 10:56
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 27 September 2012 16:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 10:47
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 06 November 2012 16:36
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:05
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 08 November 2012 22:54
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 11:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 15:39
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:00
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:17
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 22:46
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:11
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:29
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 19:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Mon, 12 November 2012 23:04
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Tue, 13 November 2012 12:50
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 00:43
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Thu, 15 November 2012 17:37
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Daniel Prusseit on Fri, 23 November 2012 16:08
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Mon, 26 November 2012 13:09
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Tue, 27 November 2012 16:48
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 15 November 2012 18:52
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 16:55
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Fri, 09 November 2012 17:18
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 November 2012 18:38
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Mon, 02 December 2013 12:26
		Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss By: Joachim Rubröder railML on Sat, 08 December 2012 22:03

Previous Topic:	stop probability
Next Topic:	wiki: missing attribute description for additionalTrainNumber at <train>

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 06 07:38:37 CEST 2024