Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » Some small changes, wishes and recommendations for RailML2 timetable schemes
Re: Some small changes, wishes and recommendations for RailML2 timetableschemes [message #811 is a reply to message #703] Mon, 17 September 2012 15:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Joachim Rubröder railML is currently offline  Joachim Rubröder railML
Messages: 0
Registered: November 2019
Hi Dirk,
>
> 9c) timetableTypes.aCirculation added:
> <xs:attribute name="vehicleIdx" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"/>
> <xs:attribute name="groupIdx" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"/>
> (group and vehicle number of a run or job inside of the circulation)
>
> Reason: This attribute is completely redundant because the information can
be >recreated by counting links (nextBlock…) which link to earlier days
(vehicleIdx) or to >lower vehicles number (groupIdx). Nevertheless, we have
been asked by other users >to provide these values to get the data easier and
to avoid misunderstandings (skipping >of vehicles during standstill).
>
There is an open Ticket http://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/75 for this
issue, that could be implemented for version 2.2.

But we discussed the naming conventions internally and are not willing in
introducing new types of "Idx"-elements. We would prefer instead:
<xs:attribute name="vehiclNumber" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:attribute name="vehicleGroupNumber" type="xs:string"/>

Would this be OK for your purpose?

Kind regards...
Joachim

--
Joachim Rubröder
Schema Coordinator: railML.timetable

--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: request for "remarks"
Next Topic: Clarification of the debitcode attribute
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri May 10 14:33:19 CEST 2024