| Re: Modified V94_12 [message #43 is a reply to message #42] |
Thu, 20 November 2003 11:23   |
volker.knollmann
Messages: 9
Registered: November 2003
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Nikolaus Fries wrote:
> But I think
>> it's a good idea to have at least the most important systems (track
>> circuits, axle counters, LZB, ETCS) at hand.
> Here you are risking an endless discussion about the "most important"
> systems, because this is the german point of view...
Okay, so I officially declare open this discussion!! :)
Anybody who wants to contribute?
IIRC, Switzerland for example uses track magnets (or track beacons) for
their widely spread ATP-systems SIGNUM and ZUB 121. And ZSI 27 / ZSI 127
uses Balises.
Austria uses LZB and PZB (INDUSI) just like Germany.
All these systems could be defined im RailML using the elements
<trackCouplingCoil>, <trackCircuit> and <Balise>, couldn't they?
Unfortunately, I know nothing about other European Countries. Who can help?
> You will probably have taken notice of my propositions concerning the
> signal element. What do you think of them?
Sorry, but when you spoke of "your propositions", I thought you were
refering to your thesis. Obviously, I was wrong. Which other proposals
have you made? I found nothing here in this newsgroup, but perhaps I'm
just blind... can you give me a hint?
> My <connection> element ist derived from <kilometer> if that might help
> you to find it. To fit it into your version it might be best made a
> subelement of <track> as an alternative to your two new attributes.
I will have a look at your scheme as soon as I found it (see above). I
promise!
> Best regards from Paris
^^^^^^^^
<kidding>
So you are the ideal candidate to add French ATP-components to
<ocsElements>, hmm?
</kidding>
As usual, best regards from Braunschweig!
Volker Knollmann
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
