Forum: railml.timetable » Proposal for new timetable schema version 2.0(?)

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » Proposal for new timetable schema version 2.0(?)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: netwokNodes, sections [message #666 is a reply to message #663]

Tue, 26 September 2006 21:14

Joachim.Rubröder
Messages: 33
Registered: September 2004

Member

Hi,

your "networkNode" and your "sections" are part of a high-level
infrastructure, which is referenced by most timetables. Most planned
trains are driving from "station A" to "station B". The "networkNodes"
could be found as "operationControlPoints" in the infrastructure, but the
"sections" between these points are still missing. This is a known lack.
The reason is, that it is easier to agree on a common description of the
tracks and switches than on the network, because "sections" are defined
differently in every railway.

Nevertheless, "networkNodes" and "sections" should be part of the
infrastructure not the timetable. A timetable could reference them via
"posID" and "sectionID" in the way you described.

Cheers,

Joachim

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Proposal for new timetable schema version 2.0(?) By: Tai Truong on Tue, 19 September 2006 18:14
		Re: operatingPeriods By: Joachim.Rubröder on Tue, 26 September 2006 20:14
		Re: projects By: Joachim.Rubröder on Tue, 26 September 2006 20:52
		Re: netwokNodes, sections By: Joachim.Rubröder on Tue, 26 September 2006 21:14

Previous Topic:	Correct use of arrivalDay/departureDay
Next Topic:	stopDescription

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 18:37:03 CEST 2024