Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » infrastructureVisualization in railML 2.2?
Re: infrastructureVisualization in railML 2.2? [message #538 is a reply to message #537] Wed, 04 September 2013 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
bob.janssen is currently offline  bob.janssen
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2013
Junior Member
Hello Thomas,
I'm not over the moon with the present visualisation model either. I'm
however convinced that visualisation is important for two reasons:
1. a visual representation of the infrastructure helps both the modeller
and the user. This is highly useful for gaining acceptance of RailML.
RailML can go the GIS-way. Lack of visualisation makes for a very opaque
tool.
2. often, multiple plans, maps, schemas are linked with an infrastructure.
E.g. there's a track plan of a station for maintenance purpose and another
schema of the same station for dispatching. Both refer to the very same
infrastructure. It is helpful to associate more than one set of
coordinates with infrastructure. So, in my opinion, it is great if we can
link an object with several coordinates. This actually reduces the
probability there are multiple discordant plans floating around.

concluding - visualisation is important but the XSD needs some
improvement.

Yours,
Bob Janssen
Siemens NL

Thomas Albrecht wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> I had a look at the infrastructure visualization implementation in
> railML 2.2.
> There is no real documentation in the wiki and no forum post about it.
> The only thing I found was the thesis of Hengartner in the document
> library dating back to 2003.
>
( http://railml.org//index.php/bibliothek.html?file=tl_files/r ailML.org/documents/science/hengartner.thesis_da.pdf)
>
> <visualization id="infraVis">
> <lineVis ref="">
> <trackVis>
>
> </trackVis>
>
> <trackVis>
>
> </trackVis>
> ...
> </lineVis>
> </visualization>
>
> What I was wondering is the strange structure of track inside line,
> which reminds me of the old railML infrastructure structure (1.x), but
> doesn't make sense for the 2.x infrastructure model. Am I right? Does
> anybody use this with railML 2.x? Or is it useful to adapt the structure
> in the next railML release?
>
> Best regards
> Thomas Albrecht
> TU Dresden
> Chair for Traffic Control Systems and Process Automation
> tu-dresden.de/vlp
>
>
>



--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: new attribute on the vehicle element
Next Topic: new attributes on the ocp element
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 11:31:22 CEST 2024