Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » last open points for speedProfiles in railML 2.2
Re: Train category for speed changes/speed profiles (was: last openpoints for speedProfiles in railML 2.2) [message #526 is a reply to message #521] Fri, 15 March 2013 16:45 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
thomas.kauer is currently offline  thomas.kauer
Messages: 15
Registered: January 2004
Junior Member
Dirk Bräuer wrote:
>
> Dear Susanne,
>
>> Questions/requests:
>>
>> * general train category attribute for the speedProfile element
>
> Not from my side - see arguments on such an attribute at "Stop posts for
> different train types". Infrastructure has to be independent from
> operators. Please always try to describe the physical background / reason.
>
>> * special train category attribute for the speedProfile element in
>> order to define "passenger" and "goods" trains
>
> Not from my side. Please always try to describe the physical background /
> reason.
>
>> * special train category attribute for the speedProfile element in
>> order to define special vehicle family types, e.g. "Flirt"
>
> "Flirt" is not a train category in this meaning, rather a vehicle family.
> Please do not mix the terms. The best would be to describe the physical
> background / reason. There must be a physical reason why a "Flirt" is
> allowed to go quicker or slower there. From a neutral, general point of
> view: This speeds should be allowed also for all other vehicles with the
> same physical attributes but with different names than "Flirt". (The
> speeds should not depend on the name of the vehicles...)
>
> If there is a need for a less neutral way: A "vehicleRef" (enumerable)
> would be acceptable.
>
> Best regards,
> Dirk.
>
>
Dear Dirk

there is certainly a physical reason, but that's not all: You need also
the permission (for example from the EBA or the BAV). So that at the end
only some construction types like Flirt may be allowed to get faster).

Best regards
Thomas


--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Maximum train current - Proposal for extension of infrastructure scheme in railML 2.4
Next Topic: Track: description vs. trackDescr
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 04 14:08:10 CEST 2024