Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » SpeedChange : Protection system reference
Re: SpeedChange : Protection system reference [message #430 is a reply to message #418] Sat, 10 November 2012 08:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Christian Rahmig is currently offline  Christian Rahmig
Messages: 151
Registered: January 2011
Senior Member
Dear Dirk and other railML users,

> Is it possible to make cross-references optional in general? That means:
> It is not necessary to give both directions. If both directions are
> given, the special XML constrains secure that they there is no conflict
> between them.

The concept of referencing and cross-referencing is a wide-spread topic,
which is enmeshed in many infrastructure elements. Therefore, I would
like to see the reference inventory in the major release railML 3.0 and
filed a trac ticket for it [1].

[1] https://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/189

Regards

--
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Alternative Stationsnamen (ocp, additionalName)
Next Topic: Tools zum Erstellen der Topologie / Tools for creating the topology
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri May 17 04:22:30 CEST 2024