Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » SpeedChange : Protection system reference
Re: SpeedChange : Protection system reference [message #404 is a reply to message #402] Wed, 24 October 2012 17:32 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Carsten Weber is currently offline  Carsten Weber
Messages: 27
Registered: November 2011
Junior Member
"Susanne Wunsch" <coord(at)commonrailmlorg> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:m14nlklz6nfsf(at)cygnusheepsaxde...
> Dear Christian, Dirk, Pierre and others,
>
> Christian Rahmig <coord(at)infrastructurerailmlorg> writes:
>> I added the request for an (optional) reference from a <signal> to a
>> <trainProtectionElement> as a comment to trac ticket [1].
>>
>> [1] https://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/173
>
> That's only one part of the idea.
>
> There are also speed changes that are ensured by train protection
> elements, such as PZB-magnets. [1]
>
Ok.

> Sure, not all speed changes have such restrictions, it should be an
> optional addition to the current <speedChange> element.

Ok.
>
> Moreover there should be more than one such a reference to different
> <trainProtectionElement>s. The Germans use up to three magnets for one
> speed aspect. [1]
>
> [1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschwindigkeitspr%C3%BCfabsch nitt

I think you are looking for the wrong case. "Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitte"
(GPA) can also be caused by sepcial situations inside of a station (e.g.
missing overlap). It is also possible to have several GPA for one speed
aspect if you need to check speed several times (e.g. S-Bahn-Tunnel in
Stuttgart from University station to "Schwabstraße"). This might be cases
you need more than one link between a speedChange and a train protection
element. So in case of an GPA which "Magnet" should be linked? Or if you do
it with balises or some thing else which might exist as a balise group and
only a single balise? In such a case you need another structure for train
protection elements. Otherwise the reading program has to guess whether the
three magnets you linked are single magnets or a GPA. There should be a
grouping element (= balise group, GPA, ...) which is linked from a speed
aspect and some train protection elements which are linked to the grouping
element.

For me it is not usefull to have such a link between speed changes and train
protection elements. There should be a tool which checks the speed steps and
searches for a required train protection grouping element and checks the
distances and all the other things around.

Best regards.

Carsten

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Alternative Stationsnamen (ocp, additionalName)
Next Topic: Tools zum Erstellen der Topologie / Tools for creating the topology
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri May 17 06:36:04 CEST 2024