Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Infrastructure semantics
Re: Language-sensitive names [message #254 is a reply to message #253] Thu, 12 May 2011 23:11 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Susanne Wunsch railML is currently offline  Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0
Registered: January 2020
Hi Tuomas,

thanks for your quick followup.

tuomastiihonen(at)mitroncom (Tuomas Tiihonen) writes:

> Looks good to me, however I wonder why the lang does not follow "ISO
> 639-1" anymore. If I understand correctly it now uses basically IETF BCP
> 47. Does someone know if ISO 639-1 has some language mapped differently
> than in IETF BCP 47? If those are different, it can cause problems, at
> least changes in the software if extra mapping is needed between the two
> language standards.

That's "old" XML style.

ISO 639-1 defines the alpha-2 language code. There are already another
alpha-3 language codes defined in ISO639-2. IETF BSP 47 mostly recycles
ISO 639-1 codes. For mapping hints see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_language_tag
("Relation to other standards")

639-1 639-2 IETF

German: 'de' 'ger' 'de', 'de-AT', 'de-CH', 'de-DE'
English: 'en' 'eng' 'en', 'en-US', 'en-GB'
Finnish: 'fi' 'fin' 'fi', 'fi-FI', 'fi-SE'
Swedish: 'sv' 'swe' 'sv', 'sv-SE', 'sv-FI'
N. Sami: 'se' 'sme' 'se'

Sorry for the disappointing answer.

Kind regards...
Susanne

--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Change of infrastructure coordinator
Next Topic: "default" attribute raises implementation problems
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 17:29:07 CEST 2024