Forum: railML.infrastructure » Infrastructure semantics

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Infrastructure semantics

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Infrastructure semantics [message #249 is a reply to message #248]

Mon, 09 May 2011 16:31

coordination
Messages: 11
Registered: May 2011

Junior Member

Dear Mr. Tiihonen,

Thank you for your enquiries to RailML.infrastructure.

Tuomas Tiihonen wrote:
> I would appreciate some infrastructure semantics explanations.

On behalf of the infrastructure coordinator I will try to answer some of
your questions from the todayâs coordinators meeting:

> Are the translations only supported in OCP (in additionalName)?
> Is there possibility to define language code for OCP's default name?

We added a ticket in our SVN (http://trac2.assembla.com/railML/ticket/121)
and will integrate additional names and language codes on short notice in
RailML's version 2.1.

> Is there possibility to give timezone for OCP?

We added a ticket in our SVN (http://trac2.assembla.com/railML/ticket/120)
and will integrate time zones on short notice in RailML's version 2.1.

> Is there possibility to define OCP (if it is a station) to have platforms
> and those platforms different segments?

We added a ticket in our SVN (http://trac2.assembla.com/railML/ticket/122)
and had an intense discussion about this. To avoid an incompatible
extension of RailML due to the wide range of facilities beside a track,
weâre not sure, if we shall implement this request into RailMLâs
version 2.1. We will see the discussion and remarks of the users within
the next weeks.

> How about side of a platform in relation to train?

The platforms are defined with their properties (e.g. with platformsides)
in RailML.infrastructure, the platform of a trainâs stop will be defined
in RailML.timetable. The reading programme may combine this information
and generate an announcement âPlease exit the train on the left hand
side.â.

> Could OCP have different heads (heads could be used for resolving
> orientation of the train in relation to stop)? So that line would link
> from ocpA head1 to ocpB head2.

Would you be so kind to specify this question?

> Is the OCP->number unique?

No. Please do not use this value anymore, because it's deprecated. You may
use OCP->code instead of this.

Best regards,

Dipl.-Ing. Vasco Paul Kolmorgen
RailML-group â Coordinator
Telephone: +49-351-46676939
Zeunerstrasse 1; D-01069 Dresden www.railml.org

--
----== posted via PHP Headliner ==----

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Infrastructure semantics By: tuomas.tiihonen on Fri, 06 May 2011 11:33
		Re: Infrastructure semantics By: coordination on Mon, 09 May 2011 16:31
		Re: Infrastructure semantics By: tuomas.tiihonen on Tue, 10 May 2011 09:03
		Language-sensitive names By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 12 May 2011 11:15
		Re: Language-sensitive names By: tuomas.tiihonen on Thu, 12 May 2011 14:55
		Re: Language-sensitive names By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Thu, 12 May 2011 23:11
		Re: Language-sensitive names By: tuomas.tiihonen on Fri, 13 May 2011 07:49
		Ocp Timezones By: Christian Rahmig on Mon, 16 May 2011 09:24
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: tuomas.tiihonen on Mon, 16 May 2011 14:58
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: Christian Rahmig on Mon, 16 May 2011 21:34
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: Joerg von Lingen on Tue, 17 May 2011 07:07
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: Susanne Wunsch railML on Wed, 18 May 2011 09:43
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: Christian Rahmig on Sat, 21 May 2011 12:44
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: tuomas.tiihonen on Mon, 23 May 2011 07:40
		Re: Ocp Timezones By: tuomas.tiihonen on Wed, 18 May 2011 09:50

Previous Topic:	Change of infrastructure coordinator
Next Topic:	"default" attribute raises implementation problems

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 29 14:09:20 CEST 2024