| [railML3] Re: Signal combinations [message #3142 is a reply to message #3114] |
Mon, 16 October 2023 17:29   |
Michael Gruschwitz
Messages: 13
Registered: May 2020
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
in general that solution looks intriguing. It will allow us to encode a lot more detail into the signals than before. Looking through your proposal, however, we came up with a couple of question, we were hoping you could answer.
- In your first example, shouldn't the signalIS also have a <isSpeedSignal type="announcement/distant"/>?
- What other values are available for the indicator types? Currently there only is "cautiousDriving" and "other" available in the standard?
- Is the signalIL function always only related to the trainMovement signal aspect of the signalIS?
- Will it be possible to specify the speed that an indicator can show? Like in the example shown in Wikipedia or below.
- Is there a preview XSD available, so that we can look into it a little more detailed?
Thanks in advance for the clarification and thank you for your work.
With regards,
--
Michael Gruschwitz
Bahnkonzept Dresden/Germany
Am 23.08.2023 um 06:20 schrieb Jörg von Lingen:
> Short correction: in first picture the closing tag shall be
> "</signalIL>"
>
> Here now a corrected picture plus an additional one for
> combination of main, distant and shunting signal on the same
> pole.
>
> Dr.-Ing. Jörg von Lingen - Interlocking scheme coordinator
> railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
> Phone Coordinator: +49 351 87759 40; railML.org: +49 351
> 47582911
> Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
[Updated on: Mon, 16 October 2023 17:40] by Moderator Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
,_Zwsig_Q102.jpg){kind=link}