Forum
Login
Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
Home
Introduction
User
Developers
Public relations
railML.org
Forum
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
Home
»
railML newsgroups
»
railML.infrastructure
»
[railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
Show:
Today's Messages
::
Show Polls
::
Message Navigator
E-mail to friend
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
[
message #3056
is a reply to
message #3054
]
Mon, 13 March 2023 16:43
David Lichti
Messages:
53
Registered:
December 2020
Member
Quote:
Are you using zero length tracks in your models?
Indeed, the TPS data model supports single node tracks, i.e. tracks with zero length.
These are actively used by several customers.
Best regards
David Lichti
Report message to a moderator
[
Message index
]
[railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
Milan Wölke
on Mon, 13 March 2023 14:42
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
David Lichti
on Mon, 13 March 2023 16:43
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
christian.rahmig
on Tue, 14 March 2023 20:18
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
christian.rahmig
on Mon, 07 April 2025 14:16
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
Christian Rößiger
on Tue, 08 April 2025 10:46
Re: [railML 2] Semantic Constraint at trackBegin and trackEnd
By:
Thomas Nygreen
on Wed, 13 August 2025 18:58
Previous Topic:
[railML3 wiki] opEquipment
Next Topic:
[railML3] Proposal of a semantic constraint for <baliseGroup>
Goto Forum:
- railML newsgroups
railML.infrastructure
railml.interlocking
railml.common
railml.rollingstock
railml.timetable
Testforum
- RailTopoModel newsgroup
RailTopoModel
-=]
Back to Top
[=-
[
Syndicate this forum (XML)
] [
] [
]
Current Time:
Sat Nov 15 19:39:53 CET 2025