| Re: [railML2] Re: Do we need a solution to declare the states of rolling stock? [message #2811 is a reply to message #2810] |
Wed, 18 August 2021 16:07  |
Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
ticket #478 was created for the issue. A possible solution is included for
review in commits [1246] and [1247].
Basically the <state> element from infrastructure was re-used in rollingstock
for formation and vehicle. As a rule the information at formation shall
overwrite possible information in vehicle.
Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen - Rollingstock Coordinator
On 18.08.2021 10:23, Carsten Weber wrote:
> Dear community,
> dear Torben,
>
> in my eyes your suggestion makes sense. Bound a data field like status to the
> vehicle so that you can check whether it is one current in use or it is only an
> idea or whatever. Maybe it should be checked before whether all entries of the
> infrastructure field could be taken one by one.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Carsten Weber
> Bahnberatung Carsten Weber
[Updated on: Wed, 18 August 2021 22:25] by Moderator Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
