Home » railML newsgroups » railml.rollingstock » [railML2] extend <formation> with the attribute @load (formation, load, weight)
Re: [railML2] extend <formation> with the attribute @load [message #2597 is a reply to message #2562] Sun, 22 November 2020 12:37 Go to previous message
Joerg von Lingen is currently offline  Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148
Registered: May 2011
Senior Member
Dear all,

the @load attribute is a good example to stress again - in rollingstock always
the physical possible values are defined, in timetable the actual use or planned
use is defined. In the attached picture the first line shows the partially
loaded wagons - this is TT. The lower line shows the completely loaded wagons -
this is RS.

Best regards,
Joerg v. Lingen - Rollingstock Coordinator

Am 27.10.2020 um 21:41 schrieb Torben Brand:
> Dear railML-community,
>
> In the Norwegian railway sector we would like to use
> predefined formations for usage in the timetable. For this
> purpose we would also like to use formations with real
> referenced vehicle, but with virtual wagons and payload.
> This is possible today in railML2.4, but is cumbersome as
> you can only define the complete formations weight with
> payload with usage of formation@bruttoWeight. We would like
> to be able to define only the towed weight of the wagons and
> payload, excluding the locomotive. This in the same manner
> as possible in formationTT@load.
>
  • Attachment: load.jpg
    (Size: 10.57KB, Downloaded 269 times)
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML2] extend <vehicleBrake> and <trainBrake> with the attribute @emergencyBrakePercentage
Next Topic: Distinguish between physical and operational
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 28 18:48:52 CET 2024