Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML 2.5] state (Shall the state "unknown" be explicitly defined?)
Re: [railML 2.5] state [message #2750 is a reply to message #2549] Fri, 04 June 2021 16:55 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Gruschwitz is currently offline  Michael Gruschwitz
Messages: 11
Registered: May 2020
Junior Member
Dear all!

Am 09.10.2020 um 15:40 schrieb Christian Rahmig:
> the element <state> is used in combination with several
> infrastructure elements in order to define these elements
> being in a certain state, e.g. "operational" or "disabled".
>
> For defining an unknown state, we have two options:
> * option 1: define a missing element <state> as being an
> unknown state
> * option 2: add new explicit value "unknown" to the state
> enumeration
>
> Which option do you prefer?

We would prefer option 2 too.

Best regards,

--
Michael Gruschwitz
Bahnkonzept Dresden/Germany
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML2] modeling of a car ramp
Next Topic: railML 2.3 infrastructure extension proposal operational properties of an OCP
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 02:10:40 CET 2024