Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML 2.5] state

Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML 2.5] state (Shall the state "unknown" be explicitly defined?)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

[railML 2.5] state [message #2549]

Fri, 09 October 2020 15:40

christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016

Senior Member

Dear all,

the element <state> is used in combination with several infrastructure elements in order to define these elements being in a certain state, e.g. "operational" or "disabled".

For defining an unknown state, we have two options:
* option 1: define a missing element <state> as being an unknown state
* option 2: add new explicit value "unknown" to the state enumeration

Which option do you prefer?

For more details, please check Trac ticket #421 [1]

Thank you very much and best regards
Christian

[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/421

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML 2.5] state By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 09 October 2020 15:40
		Re: [railML 2.5] state By: Dirk Bräuer on Fri, 09 October 2020 15:58
		Re: [railML 2.5] state By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 07 May 2021 11:22
		Re: [railML 2.5] state By: Michael Gruschwitz on Fri, 04 June 2021 16:55
		Re: [railML 2.5] state By: Thomas Nygreen on Mon, 07 June 2021 17:14
		Re: [railML 2.5] state By: christian.rahmig on Fri, 11 June 2021 16:04

Previous Topic:	[railML2] modeling of a car ramp
Next Topic:	railML 2.3 infrastructure extension proposal operational properties of an OCP

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Apr 24 16:24:32 CEST 2024