| [railML3] Micro - Meso - Macro [message #1677] |
Mon, 04 December 2017 14:30  |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 436
Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear railML community members,
When talking about railML v3 the possibility to define railway network
topology on several levels plays a key role in the discussion.
A central question, however, has not yet been completely answered:
Which railway infrastructure elements are considered to be the correct
"border elements" at each topology level?
A relevant example for illustration:
A station is an <operationalPoint> and it can be demarcated by the
location of the station entrance signals. If aggregated at mesoscopic
level, one <netElement> shall reference all microscopic topology
elements covered by the <operationalPoint>. Is this demarcation
generally accepted among all of you?
Any comments are highly appreciated...
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Rahmig - Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone Coordinator: +49 173 2714509; railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railml.org
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
