| Semantic of @type in <track> and mapping to national usage? [message #1596] |
Tue, 06 June 2017 15:41  |
Vasco Paul Kolmorgen
Messages: 55
Registered: November 2004
|
Member |
|
|
Dear IS-Community,
following the rules for the Discussion pages (see
http://wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=Dev:Wiki_Documentatio n_Guidelines#Discussion_Pages
i have to move the existing discussion about semantic of @type in
<track> and the mapping to national usage to this forum.
In the IS Developers group the a unclear mapping for the classifications
of the track in the type attribute was discussed and shall be improved
in a future version:
=== German usage / Deutsche Anwendung ===
The usage in Germany is currently AFAIK:
- Durchgehendes Hauptgleis; pro Betriebsstelle immer Eines bei je Eingleisiger und Zwei je zweigleisiger Strecken, mit Zugstraße
- Hauptgleis; alle anderen Gleise mit mindestens einer Zugstraße
- Nebengleis; alle anderen Gleise ohne Zugstraßen, nur Rangierfahrten
- Gleisverbindung; Gleise ohne eigenen Verkehrswert, in Weichenverbindungen, Überleitungen
The mapping for mainTrack to Deutschland:durchgehendes Hauptgleis is
nearby, but what's with the others:
- secondaryTrack: This is a track not frequently used (e. g. for overtaking only).
- connectingTrack: This is a transfer track from one to another track e. g. in branches, points or cross overs.
- sidingTrack: This is a siding.
- stationTrack: This is a track in a station, possibly with plattforms.
- other:anything Any value that does not fit any value from the previous enumeration list, fulfilling the constraint: at minimum two characters, whitespace is not allowed.
Any opinions for railML® 2.x and for a refactoring in railML® 3.x?
Best regards,
--
Vasco Paul Kolmorgen - Governance Coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Phone railML.org: +49 351 47582911
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
[Updated on: Tue, 06 June 2017 15:57] by Moderator Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
