Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Platforms and ramps for railML 2.2
Platforms and ramps for railML 2.2 [message #283] Thu, 22 March 2012 22:19 Go to previous message
Christian Rahmig is currently offline  Christian Rahmig
Messages: 151
Registered: January 2011
Senior Member
Hello everyone,

considering the Trac ticket #122 [1], we are thinking about the
introduction of a datatype for platforms and ramps with the next release
2.2. So, this is how it may look like:

1. <trackElements> will be extended with a new element named
<serviceSection> for modelling platforms, ramps and related facilities.

2. The new element <serviceSection> describes the part ("section") of a
track, which can be used for the exchange of passengers, goods or similar.

3. Attributes for this new element include:
- position information: defines the starting position and direction
of the serviceSection
- length: the section length which is defined as the actually usable
length (NOT the physically existing platform/ramp which can be longer)
- height: the objects's height in mm above rails (for feasible types
only)
- type: enumeration of
"platform" (passanger platform)
"ramp" (ramp for loading / unloading goods)
"maintenance" (maintenance facilities e. g. in a depot)
"loadingFacility" (Goods can be (un-)loaded from the wagon's
top / underfloor)
"cleaning" (washing facility for cars and engines)
"fueling" (facility for re-fuelling of engines)
"parking" (section for parking of rolling stock)
"preheating" (electricity or steam for pre-heating purposes)
"other"
- side: right, left (seen in positive mileage direction)

4. Each <serviceSection> can have multiple types. Tracks with platforms
on both sides need two <serviceSection> elements to force the definition
of different platform names.

5. Additional semantics:
- name: the name contains the platform number (e.g. "3")
- The associated OCP can be de-referenced from the OCP's <trackGroup>

It would be nice to hear your opinion about this model approach. Are
there any important parameters missing?

Best regards.

[1] https://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/122

---
Christian Rahmig
railML.infrastructure coordinator
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: railML alpha version 3.0.5 available / railML 2.4 announced
Next Topic: Modeling of switches
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Oct 14 13:35:10 CEST 2024