Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » Redundant <hasLevelCrossingType/designator>?
Redundant <hasLevelCrossingType/designator>? [message #3838] Fri, 12 December 2025 13:01
Torben Brand is currently offline  Torben Brand
Messages: 205
Registered: March 2016
Senior Member
Is there a redundancy between:

Infrastructure/functionalInfrastructure/LevelCrossing/typeDe signator [1]

and

Interlocking/specificInfrastructureManager/usesTypes/hasLeve lCrossingType/designator [2]

?

If not, can you please make the differences clearer.

[1] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/IS:levelCrossingIS
[2] https://wiki3.railml.org/wiki/IL:hasLevelCrossingType

[Updated on: Fri, 12 December 2025 13:03]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML 3.2] Speed dependent overlaps
Next Topic: Attribute "trainNumberField@elementNumber" Datatype
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Feb 18 13:02:17 CET 2026