Forum
Login
Forum: railML.infrastructure » suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
Home
Introduction
User
Developers
Public relations
railML.org
Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
Home
»
railML newsgroups
»
railML.infrastructure
»
suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
(new enumerations value in railML3.4)
Show:
Today's Messages
::
Polls
::
Message Navigator
E-mail to friend
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
[
message #4152
is a reply to
message #4148
]
Fri, 04 September 2026 12:09
christian.rahmig
Messages:
592
Registered:
January 2016
Senior Member
Dear Dominik,
the element //crossing/crossingAngle has been replaced completely by //crossing/ratio.
Please also see my post from June 17 in this thread [1] and the modelling approach described in Gitlab issue #719 [2].
[1] https://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=1108& ;goto=4048&#msg_4048
[2]
https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/work_items/ 719
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure schema coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
Report message to a moderator
[
Message index
]
suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Torben Brand
on Mon, 27 October 2025 13:01
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Mon, 27 October 2025 13:25
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Mon, 08 December 2025 07:44
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Mathias Vanden Auweele
on Mon, 08 December 2025 10:34
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Mon, 15 December 2025 13:56
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Mathias Vanden Auweele
on Tue, 16 December 2025 15:12
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Sun, 08 March 2026 08:14
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Mathias Vanden Auweele
on Mon, 09 March 2026 12:17
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Mon, 16 March 2026 11:29
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Fri, 20 March 2026 12:33
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Mon, 23 March 2026 11:15
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Fri, 27 March 2026 12:51
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Torben Brand
on Thu, 02 April 2026 09:54
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Fri, 12 June 2026 12:55
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Mathias Vanden Auweele
on Mon, 15 June 2026 09:22
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Mon, 15 June 2026 10:06
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Mathias Vanden Auweele
on Tue, 16 June 2026 08:09
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Wed, 17 June 2026 11:29
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Wed, 26 August 2026 08:39
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Wed, 02 September 2026 07:58
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
christian.rahmig
on Fri, 04 September 2026 12:09
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart"
By:
Dominik Looser
on Mon, 07 September 2026 09:12
Previous Topic:
[railML3] Restricting aggregation of RailTopoModel
Next Topic:
[railML3] New semantic constraint restricting RTM:level, IS:netElement and IS:netRelation
Goto Forum:
- railML newsgroups
railml.common
railML.infrastructure
railml.interlocking
railml.rollingstock
railml.timetable
Testforum
- RailTopoModel newsgroup
RailTopoModel
-=]
Back to Top
[=-
[
Syndicate this forum (XML)
] [
] [
]
Current Time:
Fri Oct 16 17:36:32 GMT+2 2026