Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart" (new enumerations value in railML3.4)
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart" [message #4037 is a reply to message #4035] Mon, 15 June 2026 10:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dominik Looser is currently offline  Dominik Looser
Messages: 65
Registered: March 2020
Member
Hi Christian,

Thank you for the input.

1) I basically agree. One question and one note:
- How do we define a 90° angle (which is a realistic case) as a ratio? Mathematically, it would be infinite.
- We still have to define that the relation of "fromNetElement" and "toNetElement" is seen in an anti-clockwise direction, as it would have been for the angle.
2) I have seen ratios in Swiss schematic plans both for switches and crossings. So I think using them makes sense from a business perspective.

Best regards,
Dominik Looser, trafIT solutions gmbh
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML3] Restricting aggregation of RailTopoModel
Next Topic: [railML3] Order of geometricCoordinate attributes
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 11 12:46:11 CEST 2026