Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart" (new enumerations value in railML3.4)
Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart" [message #3939 is a reply to message #3930] Mon, 16 March 2026 11:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dominik Looser is currently offline  Dominik Looser
Messages: 65
Registered: March 2020
Member
Quote:
- give the angleFromNetElement and angleToNetElement (in which case, making the angle a subelement instead of an attribute would make more sense to me, as multiple angles could be given)

We think that this would be sufficient for narrowing it down to one layout. It would also be easy to generate and read this data for us.
Defining several angles can be possbile, but is not necessary. It also does not matter which angle is defined.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [railML3] Restricting aggregation of RailTopoModel
Next Topic: [railML3] Order of geometricCoordinate attributes
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Sep 11 13:15:23 CEST 2026