| Re: suggestion for switchIS@type="crossingPart" [message #3930 is a reply to message #3922] |
Mon, 09 March 2026 12:17   |
Mathias Vanden Auweele
Messages: 167
Registered: February 2025
Location: Brussels
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Some other ideas to complement the angle (since topology netrelations are not possible):
- give the angleFromNetElement and angleToNetElement (in which case, making the angle a subelement instead of an attribute would make more sense to me, as multiple angles could be given)
- define two spotlocations on linear elements and the angle is mandatory between the two netelements of those spotlocations (don't like this idea very much)
- make the angle mandatory between the 'elementA' of the straightBranches' netrelations (probably cleanest approach).
Mathias Vanden Auweele
Railway data freelancer
https://matdata.eu
Brussels, Belgium
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
